Overview: A lot of my paper is still rough but my main idea is that Shakespeare uses fate and destiny to give the differences of ethics and the difference in the characters.
Title: Julius Caesar and the Ethics of Fate v. Destiny
Title: Julius Caesar and the Ethics of Fate v. Destiny
Thesis: Although
many saw the assassination of Caesar as justifiable, Shakespeare portrays the
ethics of Caesar’s assassination through the lenses of fate and destiny,
casting doubt on the action.
Scholary Sources
Rice, Julian C. “Julius
Caesar and the Judgment of the Senses.” Studies in English Literature,
1500-1900, vol. 13, no. 2, 1973, pp. 238–255. 14 Nov 2016.
Rice
discusses how stoicism and Epicureanism prove to be inadequate as definitions
of human capabilities in the lives of Brutus, Caesar, and Cassius. He also
delves into the renaissance background and how it plays a role in the
characters.
This
is helpful because the article identifies some of the logic behind why people during
the Roman Empire believed in fate and destiny.
“Julius Caesar.” Shakespeare
for Students: Critical Interpretations of Shakespeare's Plays and Poetry,
edited by Anne Marie Hacht, 2nd ed., vol. 2, Gale, 2007, pp. 333-367. Gale
Virtual Reference Library, 14 Nov. 2016.
This
article is an overview of rhetorical tools, summary, character list, and
historical context. This article really emphasizes the idea of stoicism in the
character of Brutus.
This
goes really well with the idea of accepting your destiny unemotional and not
doing anything but accepting your draw in life. This will also help build
historical context and identifying some literary tools for my paper.
GRAY, PATRICK. “Caesar As
Comic Antichrist: Shakespeare's Julius Caesar And The Medieval English Stage
Tyrant.” Comparative Drama 50.1 (2016): 1-31. Academic Search Premier.
Web. 14 Nov. 2016.
Gray
compares and contrasts the Julius Caesar potrayed by Shakespeare with the
Julius Caesar embodied in other contemporary plays in Shakespeare’s time. He
suggests that the Caesar by Shakespeare is vastly different because Caesar is
seen as a weak man, while by contemporaries in the time, Caesar was seen as
dignified and noble.
This
idea of Caesar being weak helps my article because it shows that Shakespeare
was purposefully identifying the idea that the only way for Caesar to become
Emperor is by fate.
McDonald, Russ. The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare.
Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press, 1996.
This
book is an overview of historical context that played a factor in the way that
Shakespeare thought of things that influenced his playwriting.
There
is one chapter that will help my paper that focuses on the historical records
that Shakespeare read, Latin mostly, that influenced his thought on the character
of Julius Caesar. Specifically, McDonald includes a story of Julius Caesar that
was published in Shakespeare’s time that he read and was used in his play.
Media Sources
Cuchapin, Kris. “Julius
Caesar: Fate, Fortune and Supernatural.” Prezi.com.
N.p., 11 March 2014. Web. Accessed 01 Nov. 2016.
www.prezi.com/lri4qoi05fyv/julius-caesar-fate-fortune-and-supernatural/
Kris
Cuchapin makes an insightful comment that “fate and freedom maintain a delicate
coexistence.” He asserts that certain things are left up to fate while other
things the characters are free to choose.
This
will help my paper as it gives an argument for both fate and destiny and how
each character needed to find a balance in their decisions. The presentation
reinforces the importance of fate and destiny.
Jabak, Omar. “Different
Literary Approaches to the Concept of Fate.” Linkedin.com. N.p., 19 Aug. 2014.
Web. Accessed 01 Nov. 2016.
www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140819111740-115124175-different-literary-approaches-to-the-concept-of-fate
Jabak
discusses how throughout literary history there has been this idea of fate v
destiny and how society has changed its meaning in different periods of time.
This
adds literary historical context to my paper as well as additional insights on
how to expound on the idea of fate v destiny. This will be a great article to
add credibility to my ideas on fate and destiny.
I'm just a little confused by your thesis statement. How do the lenses of fate and destiny change how we perceive the assassination? Like what kind of doubt? I haven't read that play but I'm genuinely interested in hearing how fate and destiny complicate the assassination!
ReplyDeleteMaybe some sort of back up evidence as to why the fate and destiny cause doubt to come upon the assassination would make it a stronger thesis? Otherwise, it seems like you've found some strong sources. I like the one that mentions the supernatural!
ReplyDeleteGarrett and Stella are right -- hope you can bring some clarity to your claim. Your sources have strong coherence and could really help you ground your claim. Consider including a section in which you introduce Roman philosophy (at least the part dealing with destiny/fate).
ReplyDelete